Who's at fault with this incident?
Discussion
Take a look at this dashcam footage of an accident my wife was in a couple of years ago.
Who would you say is at fault for this accident?
The insurance company have now decided this was my wife's fault and we're liable for the other party's costs and it will be registered as a fault accident on her history file, which won't be good come renewals time.
I'd be interested to hear other people's opinions on this. It seems black and white to us. Does anyone else have any experience of this happening to you? What did you do to resolve this with the insurer?
Who would you say is at fault for this accident?
The insurance company have now decided this was my wife's fault and we're liable for the other party's costs and it will be registered as a fault accident on her history file, which won't be good come renewals time.
I'd be interested to hear other people's opinions on this. It seems black and white to us. Does anyone else have any experience of this happening to you? What did you do to resolve this with the insurer?
mark-3bw80 said:
You need to fight that decision, clearly the car came around the bend on the wrong side of the road, go to court if necessary
Yep I agree, but I'm not sure how you'd even go about making that happen without spending a load of money. Are there any specialists firms that do this on a no win no fee basis?Bill said:
Is your wife in the oncoming car??!? Cos that's who is to blame.
If not (and assuming you haven't mirrored the dash cam/it's not abroad) you need to push back!
This. Complain, and take to the insurance ombudsman if you don't get the right result.If not (and assuming you haven't mirrored the dash cam/it's not abroad) you need to push back!
https://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/consumers/c...
Failing that, go social media, Mail on Sunday consumer money section etc.
I'm assuming they've not viewed the video as no rational person could assume the camera driver is at fault.
Edited by Robertb on Thursday 17th October 14:21
Think I'm going to write a letter of complaint and copy in the ombudsman. Can't believe they think this is the right decision.
We're still waiting on another insurance company to decide the fault on an accident in the same car 2 months earlier when an old boy drove into us when we were parked! Again that was all on dashcam, makes you wonder what the point of having them is.
We're still waiting on another insurance company to decide the fault on an accident in the same car 2 months earlier when an old boy drove into us when we were parked! Again that was all on dashcam, makes you wonder what the point of having them is.
Moderator edit: no naming & shaming
TO73074E said:
Absolutely barmy decision. The insurance company isn't fit for purpose if that is their honest decision.
Did the other driver stop and explain why they were driving like an utter moron? Clearly driving without due care and attention.
Other driver didn't stop, so we reported it to the police, but they were too busy to spend 30 seconds on their computer to look up the licence plate and investigate. Did the other driver stop and explain why they were driving like an utter moron? Clearly driving without due care and attention.
geeks said:
For me this would be straight to the ombudsman
As I understand it, you need to go through the insurer's complaints procedure first and then involve the Ombudsman if it's not resolved to your satisfaction. I think you have a good chance!Remember though that fault doesn't mean fault, it means your insurers were not able to recover their costs.
Chris
Edited by ScoobyChris on Thursday 17th October 14:36
Edited by ScoobyChris on Thursday 17th October 14:37
Not really enough info in the OP. As another poster noted fault doesn’t mean she caused it, it means they can’t recover all the costs.
E.g. if that car is uninsured then it could be fault if costs can’t be recovered. Some insurers then have guarantees to protect against uninsured drivers but that is a separate point really.
We really need more detail on what the letter said rather than an interpretation of it.
E.g. if that car is uninsured then it could be fault if costs can’t be recovered. Some insurers then have guarantees to protect against uninsured drivers but that is a separate point really.
We really need more detail on what the letter said rather than an interpretation of it.
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff