Manchester Airport attack on police REFORM to prosecute
Discussion
A statement for the REFORM party, THEY will prosecute those who attacked the police at Manchester airport 11 weeks ago.
This is very interesting.
All of it is very pertinent to all of what is going on with law and order in the UK.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KbvGnIuT-Kg
This is very interesting.
All of it is very pertinent to all of what is going on with law and order in the UK.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KbvGnIuT-Kg
I expect everything is on pause until the IPOC finalise their investigation into the police actions: https://www.policeconduct.gov.uk/our-work/investig...
The IPOC are hardly known for doing things quickly.
It'd have been a lot more simple had the officer not kicked / stamped on the guy's head (people may need reminding what someone 'deserves' may be different from what is lawful).
I'm not being facetious, I honestly don't know. I thought you would have to be in power to do it. Anyone can bring a private prosecution: https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/private-pros...
The IPOC are hardly known for doing things quickly.
It'd have been a lot more simple had the officer not kicked / stamped on the guy's head (people may need reminding what someone 'deserves' may be different from what is lawful).
cobra kid said:
TheRainMaker said:
cobra kid said:
How do they prosecute them?
The same way the CPS would.cobra kid said:
TheRainMaker said:
cobra kid said:
How do they prosecute them?
The same way the CPS would.kestral said:
A statement for the REFORM party, THEY will prosecute those who attacked the police at Manchester airport 11 weeks ago.
This is very interesting.
All of it is very pertinent to all of what is going on with law and order in the UK.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KbvGnIuT-Kg
Would you like to share your opinion of "what is going on with law and order in the UK"?This is very interesting.
All of it is very pertinent to all of what is going on with law and order in the UK.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KbvGnIuT-Kg
More delusion from Reform.
how can they bring a prosecution? (yes I know they can do legally) How do they gather their evidence? As this is still an ongoing case, they won't get anything from the CPS etc. Any defendants will just say there is still an ongoing investigation and can not engage in anything Reform decide to do.
how can they bring a prosecution? (yes I know they can do legally) How do they gather their evidence? As this is still an ongoing case, they won't get anything from the CPS etc. Any defendants will just say there is still an ongoing investigation and can not engage in anything Reform decide to do.
IMHO a problematic action;
I half expect they are hoping for the big issue I can see with this - by making it a political issue it becomes very difficult to ensure an impartial jury and therefore fair trial.
But if it gets thrown out they can blaim the government (despite it being their actions on grandstanding about doing a private prosecution that caused the problem)
Yes, IMHO bringing charges has been slow. Quick google had justice department stats on response times;
Currently for all offences:
Average time for police to decide to charge - 41 days.
Average for CPS decision (though from first police referal which will be shorter than above) - 46 days.
(And nearly another year on top before it gets through trial process)
(Source : https://criminal-justice-delivery-data-dashboards.... )
So we are just past the average time to prosecute for all offences, on a fairly major offence with moderate complexities (incident started on airplane, then continued in baggage reclaim, then continued + involved police (video), with possible excess force (if after any offences were committed) at airport exit.
The reality is why should this be fast tracked by government? There isn't an ongoing threat to justify rushing it ahead of other crimes (unlike recent riots).
It taking so long IS a massive issue; But that issue is widespread on the fact that ALL prosecutions are taking too long...
I half expect they are hoping for the big issue I can see with this - by making it a political issue it becomes very difficult to ensure an impartial jury and therefore fair trial.
But if it gets thrown out they can blaim the government (despite it being their actions on grandstanding about doing a private prosecution that caused the problem)
Yes, IMHO bringing charges has been slow. Quick google had justice department stats on response times;
Currently for all offences:
Average time for police to decide to charge - 41 days.
Average for CPS decision (though from first police referal which will be shorter than above) - 46 days.
(And nearly another year on top before it gets through trial process)
(Source : https://criminal-justice-delivery-data-dashboards.... )
So we are just past the average time to prosecute for all offences, on a fairly major offence with moderate complexities (incident started on airplane, then continued in baggage reclaim, then continued + involved police (video), with possible excess force (if after any offences were committed) at airport exit.
The reality is why should this be fast tracked by government? There isn't an ongoing threat to justify rushing it ahead of other crimes (unlike recent riots).
It taking so long IS a massive issue; But that issue is widespread on the fact that ALL prosecutions are taking too long...
skyebear said:
*Reform UK Party Ltd.
Have they launched a fundraiser for legal fees yet?
This. Have they launched a fundraiser for legal fees yet?
That's exactly what will happen. Fundraiser for the fees, then magically they'll announce they've been blocked from action and cry legal interference, two tier justice etc etc. It has no basis in law and could actually be seen to prejudice the ongoing investigation. Just another stunt.
ralphrj said:
cobra kid said:
TheRainMaker said:
cobra kid said:
How do they prosecute them?
The same way the CPS would.I always assumed that only CPS could bring criminal proceedings.
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff