Scamera vans raking it in

Author
Discussion

peterfield781

Original Poster:

218 posts

6 months

Sunday 25th August
quotequote all

lancslad58

1,100 posts

15 months

Sunday 25th August
quotequote all
peterfield781 said:
Why is it a scam ?

Dingu

4,341 posts

37 months

Sunday 25th August
quotequote all
Tax on fools perhaps.

MadCaptainJack

927 posts

47 months

Sunday 25th August
quotequote all
Is it true that many of these courses are taught by retired or off-duty police officers?

Glassman

23,108 posts

222 months

Sunday 25th August
quotequote all
MadCaptainJack said:
Is it true that many of these courses are taught by retired or off-duty police officers?
AA driving instructors.

GasEngineer

1,165 posts

69 months

Sunday 25th August
quotequote all
Use of the word "Scamera" is one for the "Things That Annoy You Beyond Reason" thread !

JulianHJ

8,791 posts

269 months

Sunday 25th August
quotequote all
There clearly aren't enough cameras and traffic patrols given the proportion of speeding vehicles, particularly in urban environments.

LosingGrip

7,964 posts

166 months

Sunday 25th August
quotequote all
JulianHJ said:
There clearly aren't enough cameras and traffic patrols given the proportion of speeding vehicles, particularly in urban environments.
I'm currently one of three PCs on traffic today for my force.

We are all at one crash.

There isn't enough. But it's the same in all departments.

NDA

22,304 posts

232 months

Sunday 25th August
quotequote all
lancslad58 said:
peterfield781 said:
Why is it a scam ?
I think many people would use the word scam because the camera are there, ostensibly, for safety reasons.

Mark V GTD

2,425 posts

131 months

Sunday 25th August
quotequote all
Surely the opposite is the case?

RS_MAN_CHILD

290 posts

276 months

Sunday 25th August
quotequote all
From what I have seen the traffic police need way more resource to catch DUI & using mobiles while driving offenders they should concentrate on those first & foremost as so many clearly driving like that right nowI! Its shocking how little resource they have right now.......

anyoldcardave

768 posts

74 months

Sunday 25th August
quotequote all
RS_MAN_CHILD said:
From what I have seen the traffic police need way more resource to catch DUI & using mobiles while driving offenders they should concentrate on those first & foremost as so many clearly driving like that right nowI! Its shocking how little resource they have right now.......
Perhaps if the money from cameras was invested in road policing more people would be acceptable of them, but it is not, and disappears into black holes of waste, like everything else aimed at making those who own car pay for the privelage.

Driving on gas, weed or coke is rife, so is phone use, from a lofty perch in a truck, I see it so often, far more than I see the Lesser Spotted Traffic cop.

Can go from London to Scotland, and back again, and not see a single marked car and have done.

Policing is reactive, not preventative, as the Ofiicer has stated, all 3 traffic cops at one incident, reacting to it, while the rest do as they wish with no actual road polcing, probably county wide by the sounds of it.

Nothing will change though, the country is bankrupt in real terms, there is no money to improve anything.

The Mad Monk

10,612 posts

124 months

Sunday 25th August
quotequote all
Mark V GTD said:
Surely the opposite is the case?
Que?

Getragdogleg

9,100 posts

190 months

Sunday 25th August
quotequote all
JulianHJ said:
There clearly aren't enough cameras and traffic patrols given the proportion of speeding vehicles, particularly in urban environments.
Or the limits are too low if the majority are speeding...

119

9,480 posts

43 months

Sunday 25th August
quotequote all
Getragdogleg said:
JulianHJ said:
There clearly aren't enough cameras and traffic patrols given the proportion of speeding vehicles, particularly in urban environments.
Or the limits are too low if the majority are speeding...
hehe

Mandat

4,002 posts

245 months

Sunday 25th August
quotequote all
JulianHJ said:
There clearly aren't enough cameras and traffic patrols given the proportion of speeding vehicles, particularly in urban environments.
If the limits are set unreasonably below the natural speed for a particular road, then it is not a surprise that many will continue driving up to the natural speed.

Patio

659 posts

18 months

Sunday 25th August
quotequote all
NDA said:
lancslad58 said:
peterfield781 said:
Why is it a scam ?
I think many people would use the word scam because the camera are there, ostensibly, for safety reasons.
What about average speed cameras where speed limit is reduced for air quality?

MDMA .

9,207 posts

108 months

Sunday 25th August
quotequote all
[redacted]

JagLad

109 posts

7 months

Sunday 25th August
quotequote all
MDMA . said:
A bit like 83% of road deaths are caused by sober people but it’s the drink drivers that get a bad name.
Seems like it's far safer to be ratted whilst driving then. Much less chance of having an accident. smile

Terminator X

16,290 posts

211 months

Sunday 25th August
quotequote all
Dingu said:
Tax on fools perhaps.
The only fools are those that don't see any problem at all with limits reducing around the country whilst speed cameras rise up.

TX.