Report hit and run

Author
Discussion

a303

Original Poster:

4 posts

120 months

Sunday 16th June
quotequote all
I'm curious to see what others would do...
I was cycling along a few days ago. A car pulled out from a side road in front of me and stopped across my path. I couldn't stop in time and hit the side of the car.
I shouted at the driver. The driver gesticulated at me in the mirror, then drove off.
The collision was fairly low speed, so I wasn't injured, and my bike wasn't damaged. However, the driver involved wouldn't know this as he made no effort to get out and check. I assume his car wasn't damaged, but he didn't wait around long enough for me to check.
So, what would you do - report him for hit & run, or move on? And why?
I do have a witness as the driver behind me stopped to check I was okay.

Sebring440

2,307 posts

103 months

Sunday 16th June
quotequote all
a303 said:
I'm curious to see what others would do...
I was cycling along a few days ago. A car pulled out from a side road in front of me and stopped across my path. I couldn't stop in time and hit the side of the car.
I shouted at the driver. The driver gesticulated at me in the mirror, then drove off.
The collision was fairly low speed, so I wasn't injured, and my bike wasn't damaged. However, the driver involved wouldn't know this as he made no effort to get out and check. I assume his car wasn't damaged, but he didn't wait around long enough for me to check.
So, what would you do - report him for hit & run, or move on? And why?
I do have a witness as the driver behind me stopped to check I was okay.
What is the outcome you require?

That will help you decide whether to report it or not.


Ham_and_Jam

2,567 posts

104 months

Sunday 16th June
quotequote all
Move on. You are quite clearly ok.

Master Bean

4,005 posts

127 months

Sunday 16th June
quotequote all
Report it. In this instance you are fine. Next time around could be different. Driver needs educating before doing further damage in the future.

Cylon2007

545 posts

85 months

Sunday 16th June
quotequote all
If you were going to report him why wouldn't you have done it straight away? Seems pointless a few days later as there is no damage/injury.

Nibbles_bits

1,320 posts

46 months

Sunday 16th June
quotequote all
Were you injured? Was any damage caused to your bike?
Was he injured? Was any damage caused to his car?

If the answer is no, then it's not a reportable RTC.

What are you reporting him for?

Super Sonic

7,230 posts

61 months

Sunday 16th June
quotequote all
Master Bean said:
Report it. In this instance you are fine. Next time around could be different. Driver needs educating before doing further damage in the future.
This.

whimsical ninja

197 posts

34 months

Sunday 16th June
quotequote all
As above. If you're not injured and your bike isn't damaged, then no need for the driver to provide you with their details and thus the police wouldn't take any details.

Super Sonic

7,230 posts

61 months

Sunday 16th June
quotequote all
"Driving without due care and attention advice - Page 1 - Speed, Plod & the Law - PistonHeads UK" https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...
There was not even a collision here let alone injuries so those saying if there were no damage or injuries the offence is not reportable are clearly wrong. The driver that pulled out in front of you was driving without due care and attention. Even if the only action the police take is to write him a caution letter, he will hopefully be more careful pulling out of junctions.

Nibbles_bits

1,320 posts

46 months

Sunday 16th June
quotequote all
Super Sonic said:
Master Bean said:
Report it. In this instance you are fine. Next time around could be different. Driver needs educating before doing further damage in the future.
This.
OP said they couldn't stop in time. Turn this around, if it was a car that couldn't stop in time.......

Drumroll

3,977 posts

127 months

Sunday 16th June
quotequote all
Nibbles_bits said:
OP said they couldn't stop in time. Turn this around, if it was a car that couldn't stop in time.......
Go on then explain?

Nibbles_bits

1,320 posts

46 months

Sunday 16th June
quotequote all
Drumroll said:
Nibbles_bits said:
OP said they couldn't stop in time. Turn this around, if it was a car that couldn't stop in time.......
Go on then explain?
Not driving to the conditions.

Super Sonic

7,230 posts

61 months

Sunday 16th June
quotequote all
Nibbles_bits said:
OP said they couldn't stop in time. Turn this around, if it was a car that couldn't stop in time.......
... when a car pulled out of a junction in front of him?
The car that pulled out from a junction in front of oncoming traffic would be at fault.

Super Sonic

7,230 posts

61 months

Sunday 16th June
quotequote all
Nibbles_bits said:
Not driving to the conditions.
You're really clutching at straws here.

Slowboathome

4,460 posts

51 months

Sunday 16th June
quotequote all
If I had the number plate I'd report the driver.

Every time some prick gets away with something like this they feel emboldened to do it again.

Just to be clear, I'm talking about the driving off - that was the intentional act of a . The not seeing a cyclist is a mistake, a potentially very serious one, but a bet a lot of us have made similar mistakes.

Nibbles_bits

1,320 posts

46 months

Sunday 16th June
quotequote all
Here's the important bit = did the driver stop.

Nibbles_bits

1,320 posts

46 months

Sunday 16th June
quotequote all
Super Sonic said:
Nibbles_bits said:
OP said they couldn't stop in time. Turn this around, if it was a car that couldn't stop in time.......
... when a car pulled out of a junction in front of him?
The car that pulled out from a junction in front of oncoming traffic would be at fault.
So if a car pulls out of a junction in front you, you have carte blanche to drive into them??

Super Sonic

7,230 posts

61 months

Sunday 16th June
quotequote all
Nibbles_bits said:
Here's the important bit = did the driver stop.
Oh ok, I thought it was 'no injuries or damage, no offence.' !

Drumroll

3,977 posts

127 months

Sunday 16th June
quotequote all
Nibbles_bits said:
Drumroll said:
Nibbles_bits said:
OP said they couldn't stop in time. Turn this around, if it was a car that couldn't stop in time.......
Go on then explain?
Not driving to the conditions.
Really not sure if you are being serious or not. So please explain in a bit more detail.

Super Sonic

7,230 posts

61 months

Sunday 16th June
quotequote all
Nibbles_bits said:
Were you injured? Was any damage caused to your bike?
Was he injured? Was any damage caused to his car?

If the answer is no, then it's not a reportable RTC.

What are you reporting him for?