£54 mill benefits fraud - likely sentence?

£54 mill benefits fraud - likely sentence?

Author
Discussion

Patio

Original Poster:

659 posts

18 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
What are they likely to face? Banged up at our expense?

Bet most of the cash is now in Eastern Europe anyway...

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-6877424...

Art Keller

795 posts

86 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
It will be a paltry sentence that will prove crime pays now in the UK

Mabozza

569 posts

194 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
"£54 mill benefits fraud - likely sentence?"

luxury yacht and peerage

Alickadoo

2,286 posts

30 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Patio said:
What are they likely to face? Banged up at our expense?

Bet most of the cash is now in Eastern Europe anyway...

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-6877424...
They got away with £54,000,000.00 and now we will have to keep them at a cost of £1,000.00 each week, each person.

Explain to me which bit I have missed?

Simpo Two

87,036 posts

272 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Our fault for (1) letting them in (2) giving them money.

119

9,501 posts

43 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Our fault for (1) letting them in (2) giving them money.
Yeah but, yeah but…..

Responder.First

124 posts

10 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Art Keller said:
It will be a paltry sentence that will prove crime pays now in the UK
I wouldn't surprised if its less than 5 years they gave Alex Bellfield for hurting Jeremy Vines feelings!

Foreign criminals seem to get very light sentences, 54m taken out of the system from needy people.

HHZ

75 posts

47 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
And £1500 if they accept an early deportation?

deadslow

8,287 posts

230 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
small beer compared to Bamford, plus did they not take fraud out of the crime statistics? No longer a crime in the UK.

Simpo Two

87,036 posts

272 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
deadslow said:
small beer compared to Bamford, plus did they not take fraud out of the crime statistics? No longer a crime in the UK.
If that's true then they can't go to jail.

Unless they are rude to a transgender person of course.

Yesterday Switzerland was fined for breaching women's human rights for not doing enough for climate change.

The lunatics are running the asylum...

Alickadoo

2,286 posts

30 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
deadslow said:
small beer compared to Bamford, plus did they not take fraud out of the crime statistics? No longer a crime in the UK.
Um

https://www.nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/what-we-do/...

ChocolateFrog

28,588 posts

180 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
I often think if someone with a modest amount of intelligence applied themselves to crime they'd almost certainly get away with it.

Why not stop at a few million, or 10 million, or 30 million and sail off into the sunset?

I'm quite tempted personally, chance of being caught for a white collar crime, 1 in a million?

MBVitoria

2,499 posts

230 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Not my area but I reckon 7 years each taking into account reduction for guilty plea. Automatically eligible for release after 50% served.

Back home after 3.5 years. Their relatives will probably have very nice homes and lots of money, all earned legitimately of course and no obvious link to the defendants.

Patio

Original Poster:

659 posts

18 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Would love to know how much £ was recovered

Bet it isn't more than 10%

I also think this is probably just a small % of the total being scammed and laundered abroad

Wonder how easy we'd find it popping over to Bulgaria to claim oodles of benefit cash?

deadslow

8,287 posts

230 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Alickadoo said:
deadslow said:
small beer compared to Bamford, plus did they not take fraud out of the crime statistics? No longer a crime in the UK.
Um

https://www.nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/what-we-do/...
err

https://www.cifas.org.uk/insight/fraud-risk-focus-...

WhiskyDisco

913 posts

81 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
My guess is 10 years minus a third for pleading guily. 6-7 years each.

The women will receive lesser sentences because they always do.

Forester1965

2,783 posts

10 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Sentencing starting point for the ringleaders looks like 7yrs for Fraud. Range 5-8yrs but there's obviously room to up it if necessary to a maximum of 10.

Alickadoo

2,286 posts

30 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
deadslow said:
Alickadoo said:
deadslow said:
small beer compared to Bamford, plus did they not take fraud out of the crime statistics? No longer a crime in the UK.
Um

https://www.nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/what-we-do/...
err

https://www.cifas.org.uk/insight/fraud-risk-focus-...
Arr

May not be in the stats, but it's still a crime within the meaning of the Act. (See what I did there?).

CT05 Nose Cone

25,223 posts

234 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
It will be less than the people who restrained Premier League games got.

sugerbear

4,522 posts

165 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Our fault for (1) letting them in (2) giving them money.
I agree with 2. If you think that fraud gangs only come from overseas you are sadly mistaken.

Still it is only half a "Mone" so not a great deal in the scheme of things.