Police run over calf - reasonable?

Police run over calf - reasonable?

Author
Discussion

texaxile

3,335 posts

153 months

Saturday 15th June
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
It's West London mate, not rural Shropshire. There are people milling around, out and about, all the time.

I'm a pretty vocal critic of the Met, but they're stuck between a rock and a hard place here. If they hadn't done what did, and 30 seconds later the animal runs into a mum with a kid in a pushchair, it would be "why didn't they mow the bloody thing down when they had a chance".

The policy are there to protect the public. They protected the public. If the RSPCA had run it over, you might have more of a point.
Damned if they do, damned if they don't.



Foss62

1,090 posts

68 months

Saturday 15th June
quotequote all
[quote=Somewhatfoolish]

Are you sure? That's very surprising. I'd far rather be with 20 random dogs than 20 random cattle.


Really? Most of us walk through fields containing 20 random cattle fairly regularly with no great drama. Even the commons right in the middle of Cambridge would fit that description (and I’m sure many other places are similar).

Nibbles_bits

1,272 posts

42 months

Saturday 15th June
quotequote all
dickymint said:
Nibbles_bits said:
dickymint said:
Yes if the 'right' phone call is made! Let's say it was an XL Bully on the rampage................

My vets are on call 24/7 by the way and have all the kit at their disposal.
XL Bully on the loose = the police shoot it. Plenty of examples
Of course now they do and quite right too. In the past a vet on call would be called to assist etc.
A vet might be called, but the police have Officers and equipment to deal with dogs........cows, not so much.

Edited by Nibbles_bits on Saturday 15th June 19:57

gt40steve

753 posts

107 months

Saturday 15th June
quotequote all
I didn't realise how many people don't know what a calf is !

Handled terribly by those concerned. I do appreciate it was almost certainly a new experience for them but that 'solution' would only have made sense if a large angry bull was about to endanger members of the public.

Hindsight is a wonderful thing of course but if you get a bucket or box & put anything that will rattle in it, nuts, bolts, gravel, keys, etc. most cattle will think it is their food and follow you. You should then be able to lead them / it into a safe area.

As with most animals, randomly chasing them only spooks them & is pretty unlikely to help.
With a calf that size if two blokes got a rope around its neck they could stop it. Then you tip it over and tie its legs together.
Yes, I have done it, albeit when I was younger and fitter.






Earthdweller

13,752 posts

129 months

Saturday 15th June
quotequote all
Damned if they do, damned if they don’t just about sums it up

It’s a wild beast, it’s dangerous and it was out of control

All those saying they should have got a VET and shot it with a tranquilizer … well good luck with that, seriously you’ve got two hopes and one is called Bob, likewise the RSPCA etc etc

The other option available is to shoot it .. simple as

Rural communities are different

All those complaining would no doubt be equally enraged if it had hit and killed a pedestrian Or heaven forbid a cyclist or child

The police are there to protect people and property .. that is their role

The animal has a sore leg, it will be put back in a field and probably fairly soon get a bolt in its head and be sold to you with mayo and lettuce for a fiver

E63eeeeee...

4,102 posts

52 months

Saturday 15th June
quotequote all
Nibbles_bits said:
dickymint said:
Yes if the 'right' phone call is made! Let's say it was an XL Bully on the rampage................

My vets are on call 24/7 by the way and have all the kit at their disposal.
XL Bully on the loose = the police shoot it. Plenty of examples
I'm finding some of the positions on this thread confusing. Yes, especially in London, police with guns are readily and rapidly available. But did you want them to shoot the cow? Is it not better that it was subdued with minor injuries?

E63eeeeee...

4,102 posts

52 months

Saturday 15th June
quotequote all
texaxile said:
TwigtheWonderkid said:
It's West London mate, not rural Shropshire. There are people milling around, out and about, all the time.

I'm a pretty vocal critic of the Met, but they're stuck between a rock and a hard place here. If they hadn't done what did, and 30 seconds later the animal runs into a mum with a kid in a pushchair, it would be "why didn't they mow the bloody thing down when they had a chance".

The policy are there to protect the public. They protected the public. If the RSPCA had run it over, you might have more of a point.
Damned if they do, damned if they don't.

On the horns of a dilemma, if you like.

Earthdweller

13,752 posts

129 months

Saturday 15th June
quotequote all
E63eeeeee... said:
texaxile said:
TwigtheWonderkid said:
It's West London mate, not rural Shropshire. There are people milling around, out and about, all the time.

I'm a pretty vocal critic of the Met, but they're stuck between a rock and a hard place here. If they hadn't done what did, and 30 seconds later the animal runs into a mum with a kid in a pushchair, it would be "why didn't they mow the bloody thing down when they had a chance".

The policy are there to protect the public. They protected the public. If the RSPCA had run it over, you might have more of a point.
Damned if they do, damned if they don't.

On the horns of a dilemma, if you like.
Nothing to do with the Met … not their area

Nibbles_bits

1,272 posts

42 months

Saturday 15th June
quotequote all
E63eeeeee... said:
Nibbles_bits said:
dickymint said:
Yes if the 'right' phone call is made! Let's say it was an XL Bully on the rampage................

My vets are on call 24/7 by the way and have all the kit at their disposal.
XL Bully on the loose = the police shoot it. Plenty of examples
I'm finding some of the positions on this thread confusing. Yes, especially in London, police with guns are readily and rapidly available. But did you want them to shoot the cow? Is it not better that it was subdued with minor injuries?
No. Not shoot the cow.

The other poster was comparing the police response to this cow to that of XL Bullies. They were suggesting that the police wouldn't harm the XL, when they most certainly would.

The police have training on how to deal with dangerous dogs. It's very unlikely those Officers have had training on how to deal with livestock

dickymint

24,804 posts

261 months

Saturday 15th June
quotequote all
E63eeeeee... said:
Nibbles_bits said:
dickymint said:
Yes if the 'right' phone call is made! Let's say it was an XL Bully on the rampage................

My vets are on call 24/7 by the way and have all the kit at their disposal.
XL Bully on the loose = the police shoot it. Plenty of examples
I'm finding some of the positions on this thread confusing. Yes, especially in London, police with guns are readily and rapidly available. But did you want them to shoot the cow? Is it not better that it was subdued with minor injuries?
I've no real position on this other than I know other options are/were available rather than a gung-ho approach that seems to be taken. People say 'London' as though it was in Knightsbridge during rush hour.

We'll see what comes of it.

Oceanrower

949 posts

115 months

Saturday 15th June
quotequote all
Earthdweller said:
Rural communities are different.
It’s Surrey. This may come as a surprise to you but that’s about as rural as it’s gets outside of, maybe, Somerset or Derbyshire…

Earthdweller

13,752 posts

129 months

Saturday 15th June
quotequote all
dickymint said:
I've no real position on this other than I know other options are/were available rather than a gung-ho approach that seems to be taken. People say 'London' as though it was in Knightsbridge during rush hour.

We'll see what comes of it.
Go on list them, tell me exactly what they were at 2am this morning in East Surrey

Nibbles_bits

1,272 posts

42 months

Saturday 15th June
quotequote all

[/quote]

Nothing to do with the Met … not their area
[/quote]

The Met are there. The Met have white shirts under thier Met Vests. Surrey Police uniform is all black.

The Met police Feltham. I'd imagine it's one of those areas that borders Surrey?? Surrey have to cover areas of The Met because "they don't have anyone".

It's a Surrey Police vehicle that hits the calf, but The Met a definitely involved.

Earthdweller

13,752 posts

129 months

Saturday 15th June
quotequote all
Oceanrower said:
Earthdweller said:
Rural communities are different.
It’s Surrey. This may come as a surprise to you but that’s about as rural as it’s gets outside of, maybe, Somerset or Derbyshire…
Nonsense.

It’s the part of Surrey that was part of the Met until the boundary changes in 2000

It’s effectively south west London and very urban

Nibbles_bits

1,272 posts

42 months

Saturday 15th June
quotequote all
dickymint said:
I've no real position on this other than I know other options are/were available rather than a gung-ho approach that seems to be taken. People say 'London' as though it was in Knightsbridge during rush hour.

We'll see what comes of it.
Ah yes. And despite the situation ongoing for several hours, the Police didn't think of these other options

dickymint

24,804 posts

261 months

Saturday 15th June
quotequote all
Nibbles_bits said:
E63eeeeee... said:
Nibbles_bits said:
dickymint said:
Yes if the 'right' phone call is made! Let's say it was an XL Bully on the rampage................

My vets are on call 24/7 by the way and have all the kit at their disposal.
XL Bully on the loose = the police shoot it. Plenty of examples
I'm finding some of the positions on this thread confusing. Yes, especially in London, police with guns are readily and rapidly available. But did you want them to shoot the cow? Is it not better that it was subdued with minor injuries?
No. Not shoot the cow.

The other poster was comparing the police response to this cow to that of XL Bullies. They were suggesting that the police wouldn't harm the XL, when they most certainly would.

The police have training on how to deal with dangerous dogs. It's very unlikely those Officers have had training on how to deal with livestock
I have a name if your reference to "the other poster" was at me - and NO I did not suggest anything of the kind FFS.

I'm out wavey

Nibbles_bits

1,272 posts

42 months

Saturday 15th June
quotequote all
dickymint said:
Nibbles_bits said:
E63eeeeee... said:
Nibbles_bits said:
dickymint said:
Yes if the 'right' phone call is made! Let's say it was an XL Bully on the rampage................

My vets are on call 24/7 by the way and have all the kit at their disposal.
XL Bully on the loose = the police shoot it. Plenty of examples
I'm finding some of the positions on this thread confusing. Yes, especially in London, police with guns are readily and rapidly available. But did you want them to shoot the cow? Is it not better that it was subdued with minor injuries?
No. Not shoot the cow.

The other poster was comparing the police response to this cow to that of XL Bullies. They were suggesting that the police wouldn't harm the XL, when they most certainly would.

The police have training on how to deal with dangerous dogs. It's very unlikely those Officers have had training on how to deal with livestock
I have a name if your reference to "the other poster" was at me - and NO I did not suggest anything of the kind FFS.

I'm out wavey
Yes. And not your real name. I couldn't be bothered to look it up.

What were you suggesting then??

oakdale

1,821 posts

205 months

Saturday 15th June
quotequote all
Earthdweller said:
dickymint said:
I've no real position on this other than I know other options are/were available rather than a gung-ho approach that seems to be taken. People say 'London' as though it was in Knightsbridge during rush hour.

We'll see what comes of it.
Go on list them, tell me exactly what they were at 2am this morning in East Surrey
They could have called this little fella for help.

https://afriesantv.mysite.ng/viral-video-of-little...

Nibbles_bits

1,272 posts

42 months

Saturday 15th June
quotequote all
oakdale said:
Earthdweller said:
dickymint said:
I've no real position on this other than I know other options are/were available rather than a gung-ho approach that seems to be taken. People say 'London' as though it was in Knightsbridge during rush hour.

We'll see what comes of it.
Go on list them, tell me exactly what they were at 2am this morning in East Surrey
They could have called this little fella for help.

https://afriesantv.mysite.ng/viral-video-of-little...
He was committed elsewhere

TwigtheWonderkid

43,900 posts

153 months

Saturday 15th June
quotequote all
Earthdweller said:
Oceanrower said:
Earthdweller said:
Rural communities are different.
It’s Surrey. This may come as a surprise to you but that’s about as rural as it’s gets outside of, maybe, Somerset or Derbyshire…
Nonsense.

It’s the part of Surrey that was part of the Met until the boundary changes in 2000

It’s effectively south west London and very urban
Originally I was going off the video info, that says Feltham, West London. Turns out it's Spelthorne, which is indeed Surrey, and not dealt with by the Met. But it's not rural in any way. It's just like West London.