The Official Manchester City (World Club Champions)Thread

[TownIdiot]

tamore said:

voted against them. not sure going to court about it as the new boys in town would have been a good move.

and 11 years?

Have you actually read anything about what's gone on?
Outside of blue moon

[Fast Bug]

Does anyone remember when football was good? The average fan could afford a season ticket, points deductions were virtually unheard of and you could celebrate a goal after a brief glance at the lino.

I miss those days

[tamore]

TownIdiot said:

tamore said:

voted against them. not sure going to court about it as the new boys in town would have been a good move.

and 11 years?

Have you actually read anything about what's gone on?
Outside of blue moon

not visited BM for many years. what don't i comprehend?

[TownIdiot]

tamore said:

not visited BM for many years. what don't i comprehend?

You either have absolutely no idea what's going on, or you are winding me up.

So on that basis it's not really worth me saying anything else.

[cliffe_mafia]

TEKNOPUG said:

tamore said:

i'm confused. don't know if we're the good guys or the bad guys.

If you'd challenged the rules in court 11 years ago, then you'd be the good guys.

Breaking the rules for 11 years and then challenging them in court once you are caught, not so much

HTH

We’re challenging rule changes from February this year - don’t let the facts and you not being bothered to give any of the current news articles a cursory glance get in the way having a pop though.

HTH

[mickk]

Fast Bug said:

Does anyone remember when football was good? The average fan could afford a season ticket, points deductions were virtually unheard of and you could celebrate a goal after a brief glance at the lino.

I miss those days

Jumpers for goal posts?

[tamore]

TownIdiot said:

tamore said:

not visited BM for many years. what don't i comprehend?

You either have absolutely no idea what's going on, or you are winding me up.

So on that basis it's not really worth me saying anything else.

splendid news. it's a heavy door, don't let it hit you.

[Wombat3]

Khaldoon says " let’s be judged by the facts and not by claims and counterclaims.”



Bit difficult when you won't provide the information requested....

No smoke......

[Challo]

cliffe_mafia said:

We’re challenging rule changes from February this year - don’t let the facts and you not being bothered to give any of the current news articles a cursory glance get in the way having a pop though.

HTH

That's my understanding as well. It's against the rules implemented in Feb and what the Prem league require from potential sponsors.

The claim against the voting rights does seem a bit idiotic but will have to see what the details are.

Apparently these types of challenges as re normally confidential, and this was leaked to the reporter of the times. Normally the general public don't see the results either

[Adam.]

Refeshingly honest from KDB.

Despite being the highest paid player in the league (the cleaner pays Haaland' wages via an offshore account) he would consider Saudi for the cash:

“You’re talking about incredible amounts of money in what may be the end of my career. Sometimes you have to think about that. If I play there for two years, I will be able to earn an incredible amount of money. Before that I had to play football for 15 years [to earn that].

[Martin315]

TEKNOPUG said:

tamore said:

i'm confused. don't know if we're the good guys or the bad guys.

If you'd challenged the rules in court 11 years ago, then you'd be the good guys.

Breaking the rules for 11 years and then challenging them in court once you are caught, not so much

HTH

The rules being challenged are from earlier this year so it would have been hard to challenge them 11 years ago

[Drabbesttunic]

Martin315 said:

TEKNOPUG said:

tamore said:

i'm confused. don't know if we're the good guys or the bad guys.

If you'd challenged the rules in court 11 years ago, then you'd be the good guys.

Breaking the rules for 11 years and then challenging them in court once you are caught, not so much

HTH

The rules being challenged are from earlier this year so it would have been hard to challenge them 11 years ago

Already been said

[tamore]

Drabbesttunic said:

Already been said

yes, but the borons don't read the exam question. again, and again, and again……...

[johnboy1975]

Challo said:

The claim against the voting rights does seem a bit idiotic but will have to see what the details are.

Apparently they want a straight majority - so 11 to 9 as opposed to 14 to 6 as is current. Which isn't quite as batst as all the "tyranny of the majority" bks

[mylesmcd]

tamore said:

Drabbesttunic said:

Already been said

yes, but the borons don't read the exam question. again, and again, and again……...

We understand you have a City before anything attitude, and its great and everything. However, its the concept of outside money ruining the league everyone is talking about, not whether Man City are a good football team...

[tamore]

mylesmcd said:

We understand you have a City before anything attitude, and its great and everything. However, its the concept of outside money ruining the league everyone is talking about, not whether Man City are a good football team...

ruining…..

do you want to borrow a hankey?

[mylesmcd]

tamore said:

mylesmcd said:

We understand you have a City before anything attitude, and its great and everything. However, its the concept of outside money ruining the league everyone is talking about, not whether Man City are a good football team...

ruining…..

do you want to borrow a hankey?

I couldnt possibly enter a dialog with you tamore, you intellectual heavy weight you.... no matter how many hankies you have.