RE: One-of-five MG RV8 GT for sale

RE: One-of-five MG RV8 GT for sale

Tuesday 2nd July

One-of-five MG RV8 GT for sale

MG never made an RV8 coupe, but that doesn't mean you can't buy one...


It’s hardly surprising that the MG restomod scene is having a moment. Companies like Frontline can thrive because there are very fond memories of simple sports cars like the B - but also plenty of ways they can significantly be improved. They’ll always be pretty, there remain quite a few around because of their popularity in period, and with companies like British Motor Heritage still making shells the possibilities are almost endless. And who wouldn’t be intrigued by the very best an MG B can be?

This isn’t a new phenomenon, however. Frontline was set up in 1991, and some odd decisions made by MG back in the day meant a strong aftermarket scene soon emerged off the back of its little sports cars. Having done the decent thing and put the V8 into a B to make the GT, MG never made a GT Roadster - what a great little hot rod that could have been. It wasn’t until the launch of the RV8, almost 20 years on from the launch of the MG B GT, that the Rover V8 got its drop-top calling. Only by then it wasn’t so pretty anymore. 

This led a few to wonder what a more modern take on the MG B GT might be like. A company called Maidstone Sports Cars ran with the idea in the mid-'90s, melding some MG B with RV8 to create this, the RV8 GT. Or the car that MG never made and perhaps should have. According to the advert for this one, five were built about 30 years ago (so perhaps the idea wasn’t quite as popular as it might have been) with everything you’d hope to see from a modern restomod: more power, more style, better suspension and brakes, plus a big bill at the end of it. 

This one was a famous RV8, featuring in magazines and on Top Gear. Built from a 1977 donor car, more than £23,000 was spent in 1995 (£56k in today’s money) turning it into a GT. Since then it’s said to have received an even larger V8 (from 3.9 to 4.6) and more recently a £10k respray in Old English White. Once used as a daily driver with a car phone (!), it’s covered 20,000 miles since the conversion and is ready to rile up purists at your local classic car rally. 

Looks pretty cool, right? The RV8 could never look truly modern, even by '90s standards, because there was still some heavily revised MG B underneath, but there’s certainly something sportier and more purposeful about a hardtop riding low on Minilites. The interior ages it rather more than the outside (little wonder so much time is spent on redoing them now), though even a new steering wheel would surely help it significantly. Don’t forget even the overhaul was 30 years ago. 

The asking price is £25k, which is no longer extraordinary money for any of the old MGs. There are low mileage soft-top RV8s at more than £30k, and even four-cylinder Bs not far off if they’re exceptional. None will be quite so rare (it’s reckoned just three of these GTs are now in the UK) or as interesting as the MSC build, and there’s the potential of something quite smart to drive here as well. If nothing else, it’s likely to raise a smile and get people talking - a large part of why we love old classics of all shapes and sizes in the first place.


See the full ad

Author
Discussion

Gecko1978

Original Poster:

10,006 posts

160 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
That's nice not sure about colour but definitely a nice car

Doofus

26,606 posts

176 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
That's an MGB with a bodykit. It's not an RV8 with a roof.

Wacky Racer

38,480 posts

250 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Not for me.

A MG RV8 factory soft top however....

rallycross

12,943 posts

240 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
that looks horrible with some kind of naff 80's style bodykit.

WPA

9,227 posts

117 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Awful in every way, easy to see why they only made 5


Turbobanana

6,454 posts

204 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
As a former B GT owner I want to like it. But I can't, and I think it's a combination of the colour and the rear ride height. My old B, as most of the chrome bumper or "Sebring-style" cars did, sat low at the back and looked excellent. This looks like it's permanently facing downhill.

MKnight702

3,123 posts

217 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Love the look of the original MGB and MGB GT, I have never liked the MGB RV8 and this is even worse. vomit

Give me a chrome bumper version every time (I would even take a rubber bumper version over this every day of the week)

S600BSB

5,683 posts

109 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
rallycross said:
that looks horrible with some kind of naff 80's style bodykit.
Agree

Doofus

26,606 posts

176 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Article said:
Having done the decent thing and put the V8 into a B to make the GT, MG never made a GT Roadster
The MGB GT was launched in 1965 with a 1.8.

The V8 version was launched in 1973, and was called the MGB GT V8

dontlookdown

1,808 posts

96 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Doofus said:
The MGB GT was launched in 1965 with a 1.8.

The V8 version was launched in 1973, and was called the MGB GT V8
Yup. Someone has got their Bs, GTs and V8s mixed up, and lost a decade or so somewhere too for good measure.

This thing has been beaten black and blue with the ugly stuck. Not for me thanks.

Andy86GT

374 posts

68 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Glad to see I'm not alone in thinking this is awful. Looks too tall and top heavy.
The RV8 roadster is much nicer and quite affordable judging by the classifieds.

mgtony

4,029 posts

193 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Not sure why anyone thought that colour would be an improvement on the previous blue. The green interior doesn't help things either, nor that steering wheel.



This on the other hand, which was also on PH a few years back looks a bit more cool

https://www.pistonheads.com/news/ph-spottedykywt/m...

CKY

1,559 posts

18 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
That steering wheel needs to die a deeply unpleasant death, need to go and rinse my eyes out with bleach after looking at that. Would rather steer by mole grips than have something like that in any car of mine.

BigChiefmuffinAgain

1,115 posts

101 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
That just looks a bit of a mess....

WPA

9,227 posts

117 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
MKnight702 said:
Love the look of the original MGB and MGB GT, I have never liked the MGB RV8 and this is even worse. vomit

Give me a chrome bumper version every time (I would even take a rubber bumper version over this every day of the week)
Agreed, chrome bumper is lovely


ducnick

1,853 posts

246 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
This looks horrid so it’s a no from me…. However it did make me browse the ads for the real RV8’s and it reminded me how pretty they are, and what a good choice one would be for a weekend classic with an element of usability.

TIGA84

5,240 posts

234 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
ducnick said:
This looks horrid so it’s a no from me…. However it did make me browse the ads for the real RV8’s and it reminded me how pretty they are, and what a good choice one would be for a weekend classic with an element of usability.
Funnily enough I saw one yesterday and they still look great.

Horsebox Man

97 posts

19 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
I would have preferred a colour swap to Nightfire red and some red accents on the interior.

I do like an MGB, I converted my own 1.8 to a V8 back in the day. I also like the RV8, but they bastardised the original tooling to make that bonnet, which seemed such a travesty after so long in production.

This one in this colour, with that interior is a no from me. It would have to be around £16k for me to look at this over a proper RV8 and ultimately I would want a factory built one from the 70's over an RV8.

Capitan Obvio

17,824 posts

203 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
WPA said:
Awful in every way, easy to see why they only made 5
Harsh but fair.

Wheel Turned Out

689 posts

41 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Definitely a no from me. Would much rather a soft top, in Oxford Blue.