The 2024 Weight Loss Thread

The 2024 Weight Loss Thread

Author
Discussion

thepritch

740 posts

168 months

Wednesday 19th June
quotequote all
Listened to a interesting podcast (High Performance Podcast) with Tim Spector. He talks about how calorie counting and exercise doesn’t work for losing weight. I should add that those are headlines and actually what he means is calorie counting doesn’t work as it’s not sustainable, and exercise doesn’t work because you end up hungry and eating more. Essentially the body is clever and works really hard to store energy in case of food scarcity.

Contentious part over (I don’t like how it’s all phrased for headlines but get what he’s trying to say)…. He then goes on to say that eating real food, non processed, and a wide variety of it is the way to sustainably lose weight. Which is what I’m trying to do. Just eat really good food.

If you’re up for it, have a listen, it’s just come out. Interested to hear what people think.

mcelliott

8,765 posts

184 months

Thursday 20th June
quotequote all
thepritch said:
Listened to a interesting podcast (High Performance Podcast) with Tim Spector. He talks about how calorie counting and exercise doesn’t work for losing weight. I should add that those are headlines and actually what he means is calorie counting doesn’t work as it’s not sustainable, and exercise doesn’t work because you end up hungry and eating more. Essentially the body is clever and works really hard to store energy in case of food scarcity.

Contentious part over (I don’t like how it’s all phrased for headlines but get what he’s trying to say)…. He then goes on to say that eating real food, non processed, and a wide variety of it is the way to sustainably lose weight. Which is what I’m trying to do. Just eat really good food.

If you’re up for it, have a listen, it’s just come out. Interested to hear what people think.
Exercise makes you hungry, well yes and there’s nothing wrong with being hungry, it’s all about self control, and he’s always banging on about eating 30 different colors of food everyday or whatever, no wonder people are so confused over what to eat these days, cut down on processed but not completely throw in any form of exercise, one that you actually enjoy and the weight will fall off for the vast majority

caiss4

1,899 posts

200 months

Friday 21st June
quotequote all
Hands up, I have to be honest, I've failed to meet my target weight by target date (88kgs by May). End of May I was at 92.2kgs and today I weighed in at 92.4kgs. In my defence I've just returned from 2 weeks in Italy where all the norms went out of the window although the level of activity was maintained to reasonable degree with loads of walking.

So I need to set a new target date and I'll be heading down to Devon in September so I'm going to make that the new target date and I'll keep updating.

996Type

778 posts

155 months

Friday 21st June
quotequote all
gangzoom said:
a311 said:
So my problem isn't exercise it's being a fat bd. I'm not a regular drinker but just love food and lots of it.
This is the real ‘key’ not eating like a pig. I find it takes constant self control, when out with friends/family etc, I can eat more than anyone else, a lot more!! I also cannot resist a good beer/glass of wine, I get people constantly asking me how I’ve managed to loss weight but still eat……the answer, during the week I hardly ever have lunch, and quite often no breakfast, its partly down to how busy the work day is, but its also because if I had lunch on a regular basis, I would be back to 30weeks pregnant dad in the blink of an eye.

I’m essentially functioning of one meal a day M-Fs for the last couple of year, essentially intermittent fasting during the week. Dinner however is a big meal, very big, this approach seems to work for me and it’s now essentially ‘normal’ for me. What’s the long term physiological impacts, no idea, but studies suggests it shouldn’t be harmful versus 3 meals a day, and it’s certainly better than been overweight.

The studies seem to suggest, all the hormones associated with weight gain, insulin/FGF/IGF aren’t overly expressed in one large meal versus 3 smaller meals, so essentially your body is exposed to high levels of insulin/FGF/IGF only once a day versus 3 times a day.

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/ar...

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC95717...

There also might be something in the trend to monitor individual glucose levels for people without diabetes (Zoe), there seems to be some science behind how different people vary their insulin secretion in response to different sugar levels, or how different foods peak sugar levels differently in people wherefore causing difference in insulin secretion. Insulin been a key hormone in body weight homeostasis. However I’m too tight (also cannot be bothered) with even considering trying something like Zoe.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14749262/

https://e-dmj.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.4093/dmj...

Edited by gangzoom on Sunday 26th May 08:37
This seems to work for me also, skipping formal meal times at breakfast and lunch in lieu of dinner.

Everything is geared around food and it takes a lot of effort to be able to avoid excess in society, but the easiest calories to lose are those you don’t take on in the first place….

biggbn

24,332 posts

223 months

Sunday 23rd June
quotequote all
OK, so weight loss question...weight training for weight loss...big weight, low reps or low weight, high reps? Example, I usually train legs with one work set, @140kg x 10, so 1400kg lifted. Yesterday I went up to 160kg for an easy single then completed two sets of 20 reps with 60kg as part of a superset, so, 2400kg lifted..Have I expended more energy, therefore burnt more calories? I am aware that training big muscle groups continues expending energy after the workout ends and the fatigue seems similar for both methods. I am going to mix the workouts up moving forward, best of both worlds, I do value strength and believe strong ligaments, tendons, more dense musculature will help me as I grow older, but from a mathematical point of view, what's best for burning fat....

mcelliott

8,765 posts

184 months

Sunday 23rd June
quotequote all
biggbn said:
OK, so weight loss question...weight training for weight loss...big weight, low reps or low weight, high reps? Example, I usually train legs with one work set, @140kg x 10, so 1400kg lifted. Yesterday I went up to 160kg for an easy single then completed two sets of 20 reps with 60kg as part of a superset, so, 2400kg lifted..Have I expended more energy, therefore burnt more calories? I am aware that training big muscle groups continues expending energy after the workout ends and the fatigue seems similar for both methods. I am going to mix the workouts up moving forward, best of both worlds, I do value strength and believe strong ligaments, tendons, more dense musculature will help me as I grow older, but from a mathematical point of view, what's best for burning fat....
I’m gonna be really boring and say it can be done BUT the most effective loss is in the kitchen, my own experience is high protein lowish carbs combined with lifting across ALL the rep range with a big nod towards cardio, this enabled me to lose about 65lb in about 14 months, don’t over think it.

75Black

814 posts

85 months

Sunday 23rd June
quotequote all
Weighed in today, up a bit from 76.0 to 76.4kg but I'm not overly fussed. A lot of left over BBQ was eaten this week and birthday cake so will just need to make up for it this week and go back down again. Not sure if the sudden 0.8kg drop from 76.8 to 76.0 last week was an anomaly, as I definitely wasn't expecting it. I'd rather lose weight progressively rather than these random sudden drops.

biggbn

24,332 posts

223 months

Sunday 23rd June
quotequote all
mcelliott said:
biggbn said:
OK, so weight loss question...weight training for weight loss...big weight, low reps or low weight, high reps? Example, I usually train legs with one work set, @140kg x 10, so 1400kg lifted. Yesterday I went up to 160kg for an easy single then completed two sets of 20 reps with 60kg as part of a superset, so, 2400kg lifted..Have I expended more energy, therefore burnt more calories? I am aware that training big muscle groups continues expending energy after the workout ends and the fatigue seems similar for both methods. I am going to mix the workouts up moving forward, best of both worlds, I do value strength and believe strong ligaments, tendons, more dense musculature will help me as I grow older, but from a mathematical point of view, what's best for burning fat....
I’m gonna be really boring and say it can be done BUT the most effective loss is in the kitchen, my own experience is high protein lowish carbs combined with lifting across ALL the rep range with a big nod towards cardio, this enabled me to lose about 65lb in about 14 months, don’t over think it.
Agree 100% re diet, and as stated am gonna mix the rep range up. It was more of a general question. Thanks for taking the time to reply.

Wilmslowboy

4,230 posts

209 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Achieved pretty much zero weight loss last year, started this year the same way.
Had a bit of a shocking medical end of Feb, so kicked into gear.

No fad diet (i.e. keto, Atkins, etc) instead simple clean eating.

No breakfast cereal (other than home made porridge, or boiled egg) , almost zero bread, only boiled potatoes (no mash. chips etc), no sweets, cakes etc, lunch is almost always masses of vegetables/ salads with something like tuna.

Lots and lots of fruit, nuts and greek yogurt (so hardly feel hungry or crave anything), if its a cooked meal, has to be made from scratch (single ingredients). Almost zero alcohol, occasional glass of wine a week.
Had bit of blip on holiday last month (full board) but recovered.
Work in office of over 250 people, almost always donuts, cakes and chocolates being handed out.



BMI says I need to get down to 70Kg

Chart is 6 months but weight lost in the last 3 months.




Mannginger

9,225 posts

260 months

Saturday
quotequote all
I don't know if this is "cheating" but have just re-set my starting weight after essentially 2 months of no work and it's now 2kgs higher than January!

My mum came down last weekend and utterly shamed my by losing a stone and a half so she's re-motivated me!

Pizzaeatingking

508 posts

74 months

Saturday
quotequote all
I was reading an article the other day, it reckoned there were two clear groups of people when in comes to weight loss & wanting to loose weight. You have the first group of people who essentially just need to consider their life style, perhaps make a few small changes to their food intake and their exercise/general lifestyle, being a little more aware of what their doing.

The second group are people who know what they should be eating, they know how many calories are in any given food item and know how much exercise they should be doing but they have an issue with their relationship with with food, stemming from childhood or a previous experience perhaps, these people might need to address that issue to make progress.

It does kinda make sense in my mind, I'd say I'm in the second group but couldn't say why I struggle with food. I've always overeaten, it's like I'm not sure when my next meal will come from, I don't know why.

Anyway, I've been plodding along nicely, latest results;
Start; 342.2 lb (155.2 kg)
Current 318.6 lb (144.5 kg)
Lost 23.6lb (10.7 kg)

This is the lightest I even remember weighing in my adult life. Almost dropped me into obese class 2 instead of 3 which is nice. I'm sure how much Im aiming for tbh but 270ish perhaps would be nice.

75Black

814 posts

85 months

Weighed in this morning this I'd be either steady or up in weight, nope a drop from 76.4 to 75.5kg. Not sure where a lot of this weight loss is coming from but I'm not complaining.

yellowjack

17,111 posts

169 months

I just weighed myself at 1300hrs, fasted. Only intake last night was a tube of Pringles, a few pistachios, and [mumbles] fingers of dark rum while I watched the football.

Last night the scale said 71.1 kg, this morning it said 70.7 kg, and this afternoon it says 69.9 kg. So a difference of 1.2 kg over 18 or so hours. I'd been steady at just under 71 kg before I went camping at a (history) festival for a week,

I'm not sure I quite believe the tale of the scale, but it is nice to sneak under 70 kg, even if I'm sat here undoing the good work with white bread and soft cheese (the hunger was getting hard to live with after 17 hours fasted).

When I started "playing along" with this thread I thought I'd be lucky to get below 73 kg in the year. Now, though, I've exceeded that (admittedly arbitrary) goal, and comfortably so. In the process I've learned a great deal about myself, and have come to accept that I was kidding myself about how much I was eating and what my "natural weight" was. I can even see that there's more that I can lose if I maintain the diet and exercise changes I've made up to now.

I've not cut any particular food out, nor had to give anything up completely, so I don't see the changes I've made as being difficult to sustain. And the increased amount of exercise is mainly cycling and running, both of which I enjoy. I feel quite positive about the second half of the year right now. Losses on the scale will probably be less dramatic, and I doubt I'll ever get my BMI down to where my Garmin Connect app wants me to aim for, but I'm chalking it all up as a success in every respect, apart from the horrible prospect of having to go shopping for clothes in smaller sizes. I've run out of holes, for example, on my favourite belt.

Good luck to all of you who are still working at losing timber. I don't mean this post as a boast, it's just that I'm genuinely surprised at just how quickly some relatively small changes have had a big effect on my weight and on my fitness...

996Type

778 posts

155 months

Well done to everyone for sticking at it!

I set myself a 6 month target at Xmas, was around 108KG or so late last year. Wanted to drop to 90KG by 1st July.

Met that earlier than I expected and revised it down to 80KG, I’m currently 82KG now the deadline is here.

Did hit a plateau at 82KG a couple of weeks ago, also a few more treats have crept back in.

Been mostly on unprocessed foods and fewer calories.

Still want to breach the 80KG target and make that my new ceiling if possible, which just gets me into the healthy BMI range if I do by a couple of points.

Waste measurement is now well below half my height (it wasn’t beforehand!) but I have lost some muscle mass certainly. Not too fussed about that but will be back to some resistance training to ensure no more is lost.

Suggest you take pics all the way through as it’s not obvious when you go through the process the weight is coming off and it also serves to motivate you that it’s worth it.

Before….


996Type

778 posts

155 months

After (now)….

Smitters

4,035 posts

160 months

Yesterday (12:09)
quotequote all
biggbn said:
OK, so weight loss question...weight training for weight loss...big weight, low reps or low weight, high reps? Example, I usually train legs with one work set, @140kg x 10, so 1400kg lifted. Yesterday I went up to 160kg for an easy single then completed two sets of 20 reps with 60kg as part of a superset, so, 2400kg lifted..Have I expended more energy, therefore burnt more calories? I am aware that training big muscle groups continues expending energy after the workout ends and the fatigue seems similar for both methods. I am going to mix the workouts up moving forward, best of both worlds, I do value strength and believe strong ligaments, tendons, more dense musculature will help me as I grow older, but from a mathematical point of view, what's best for burning fat....
It's more complex than weight lifted = calories expended. I couldn't even come close to explaining it better than Google would. However, I think the main message I have taken away from the successful posters here is that sustainability and consistency have a massive impact. So, I would say you're better doing what you enjoy, weights wise, because that helps get you into a "virtuous cycle" where you enjoy and want to do well at something, so you do the things that support it (eat healthily, sleep more, hydrate better) and thus, you do well at it. So you want to do better and you do the things to support it... etc. etc.

TLDR, do what you enjoy, except if it's vegetating on the sofa eating sweets and crisps.



I'm still ticking along, stuck stubbornly at the 80kg mark and as someone posted above, kidding myself that I'm still eating as well as I was a few months ago. I'm not. So I'm back to being more fastidious about junk. And while calorie counting may not be sustainable, what I do like about it is MFP educates me on the calories in a portion, as well as the hidden carbs and calories in say, butter/mayo/ketchup. All the little bits I forget about. So no, I can't do MFP every day, but it does help remind me that 100g of granola is not a healthy choice.